Nexus Stream

How long is this DHS shutdown expected to last?

I write the Thursday column at Nexus Stream—48 hours after the news, when the dust settles. Virginia-raised, Columbia-trained, now in western Mass with a dog and too many books.
Maeve Aldridge

This specific Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding lapse is currently **expected to last until a continuing resolution (CR) or full appropriations bill is passed by Congress**, following the expiration of the current funding mechanism, which sources indicate places DHS operations at risk unless last-minute action occurs (https://www.facebook.com/MilitaryFANet/posts/%EF%B8%8F-dhs-funding-update-february-12-2026%E2%84%B9%EF%B8%8F-the-latest-congress-has-not-yet-passed-a/1309460607878808/). While the exact duration is contingent upon political negotiation, history suggests these short-term funding gaps can vary widely, though the agency has contingency plans to keep essential services running. This situation is significant because it hinges on deep partisan divides regarding immigration policy, which is the sticking point for full funding approval.

## What is the immediate cause of the potential DHS shutdown?

The immediate cause of the current DHS funding crisis stems from Congress's failure to pass comprehensive appropriations legislation or an extension before the current funding deadline expired (http://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/facing-reality-democrats-ignore-facts-heading-dhs-shutdown). Specifically, recent legislative action, such as a Senate vote blocking a funding bill from advancing, has significantly raised the likelihood of a shutdown for the department (https://www.ksl.com/article/51447602/senate-blocks-homeland-security-funding-raising-likelihood-of-shutdown). Negotiations are typically stalled over policy riders—often related to border security and immigration reform—that one party demands be attached to the funding authorization. When the deadline is missed, funding ceases for non-essential services, triggering the shutdown protocols.

### How many DHS employees would be immediately affected by a shutdown?

While the term "shutdown" suggests a complete halt, DHS has contingency plans that ensure the majority of its workforce continues operations. According to the agency's own shutdown planning, **more than 90% of DHS's 272,000 employees would continue working during a lapse** (https://www.wdsu.com/article/dhs-partial-shutdown-funding-deadline/70345314). This means that mission-critical functions—including border patrol, cybersecurity, and emergency response operations—are deemed essential and are generally required to report to work without immediate pay. However, non-essential personnel, administrative staff, and certain support functions are often furloughed until funding is restored.

### What critical services remain operational during a partial DHS shutdown?

Critical services deemed essential for national security and public safety are maintained during a partial shutdown, ensuring the continuity of core homeland security functions (https://www.wdsu.com/article/dhs-partial-shutdown-funding-deadline/70345314). This typically includes active law enforcement, counter-terrorism efforts, air and port security screening, and emergency management response coordinated through FEMA. The distinction between essential and non-essential staff is defined well in advance of a funding lapse, prioritizing life, property, and national security above administrative functions.

### What are the primary political sticking points preventing a resolution?

The primary political sticking points preventing a swift resolution revolve heavily around immigration policy and border security measures. Legislative efforts have stalled because one faction demands stringent border reforms as a condition for approving funding, while the opposing side argues against linking essential government funding to controversial policy changes (https://www.ksl.com/article/51447602/senate-blocks-homeland-security-funding-raising-likelihood-of-shutdown). The impasse often occurs when policy demands become non-negotiable, leading to a breakdown in the appropriations process, as seen when the Senate blocked a funding bill despite House members having already left Washington (https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/02/12/congress/dhs-shutdown-all-but-certain-after-failed-senate-vote).

## Key Takeaways for Stakeholders

Understanding the mechanics and political drivers of a DHS funding lapse is crucial for anyone relying on federal services or operating near border zones.

* **Contingency Operations:** The majority (over 90%) of DHS staff are expected to continue working during a shutdown, though they may face delayed paychecks.
* **Essential Services Remain:** Core security, law enforcement, and emergency response functions are prioritized and generally unaffected in terms of service delivery.
* **Political Drivers:** The delay is fundamentally rooted in partisan disagreements over immigration policy, not a lack of consensus on the general need to fund the department.
* **Duration is Unknown:** The shutdown will last only as long as political negotiations are deadlocked, meaning the end date is entirely dependent on a bipartisan agreement in Congress.

## Conclusion

The question of how long a DHS shutdown will last remains firmly in the hands of congressional leadership, contingent upon their ability to bridge the profound policy chasm regarding immigration and border security. While the operational impact is mitigated by robust contingency planning, the lingering uncertainty highlights the fragility of short-term funding mechanisms. For the public, this remains a critical reminder that essential government functions are often held hostage by high-stakes political maneuvering, demanding vigilance until a durable, long-term funding solution is achieved.

## References

* https://www.wdsu.com/article/dhs-partial-shutdown-funding-deadline/70345314
* https://www.facebook.com/MilitaryFANet/posts/%EF%B8%8F-dhs-funding-update-february-12-2026%E2%84%B9%EF%B8%8F-the-latest-congress-has-not-yet-passed-a/1309460607878808/
* http://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/facing-reality-democrats-ignore-facts-heading-dhs-shutdown
* https://www.ksl.com/article/51447602/senate-blocks-homeland-security-funding-raising-likelihood-of-shutdown
* https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/02/12/congress/dhs-shutdown-all-but-certain-after-failed-senate-vote


More Stories

Which specific Canadian curling team or players are involved in these cheating allegations?

Canadian curling players Marc Kennedy and Brad Jacobs faced cheating allegations during a Winter Olympics match against Sweden, but World Curling found no technical violations, issuing only a verbal warning for profanity.

I write the Thursday column at Nexus Stream—48 hours after the news, when the dust settles. Virginia-raised, Columbia-trained, now in western Mass with a dog and too many books.
Maeve Aldridge

What is the "Canada curling cheating" scandal actually about?

Canada curling cheating scandal involved Swedish allegations against Marc Kennedy for illegal stone contact, leading to heated exchange and World Curling's procedural changes despite no official violations found.

I write the Thursday column at Nexus Stream—48 hours after the news, when the dust settles. Virginia-raised, Columbia-trained, now in western Mass with a dog and too many books.
Maeve Aldridge